Exposure-response analysis of the efficacy and safety of esaxerenone, a novel nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blocker, in hypertensive patients with or without diabetic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Esaxerenone is a novel non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blocker. Here, we assessed efficacy and safety exposure-response relationships of esaxerenone and its covariates and thereby justified the recommended dosage regimens, focusing on the safety benefits of up-titration regimen in patients at higher risk for increased serum potassium (sK+). METHODS: The relationships between model-derived individual esaxerenone exposure and efficacy (blood pressure [BP]) and safety (increased sK+) were evaluated using multivariate linear regression and Cox regression analyses, respectively, using data from 1453 hypertensive patients with or without diabetic kidney disease in five clinical studies. RESULTS: Exposure-efficacy analyses demonstrated that higher exposure was linearly associated with greater BP reduction over the investigated dose range. Exposure-safety analyses showed that higher exposure was associated with a higher risk of increased sK+ under a fixed-dosing regimen; higher baseline sK+ and lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were influential covariates. Model-based simulations suggested that fewer occurrences of increased sK+ are expected under the up-titration regimen (from 1.25 to 5 mg) relative to the fixed-dosing regimen (5 mg) in patients with different combinations of these covariates. CONCLUSIONS: The exposure-response analyses supported the esaxerenone recommended doses and the safety benefits of using the up-titration regimen.

Population pharmacokinetics of esaxerenone, a novel non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blocker, in patients with essential hypertension, patients with diabetic nephropathy, and healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: Esaxerenone is a novel, non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) blocker with improved selectivity and affinity for MR. The objectives of this study were to model the population pharmacokinetics of esaxerenone in a diverse population and to evaluate the effect of covariates on pharmacokinetics parameters. METHODS: A total of 8263 plasma esaxerenone concentrations from 166 healthy volunteers, 1097 hypertensive patients and 360 patients with diabetic nephropathy were pooled. A three-compartment model with sequential zero- and first-order absorption was used to describe the time-courses of plasma esaxerenone following single and multiple doses once daily for up to 12 weeks. Covariate effects were estimated using the full covariate modeling approach. Clinical relevance of covariates was ascertained using tornado plots. RESULTS: Esaxerenone was estimated to have high bioavailability (85.3%), low clearance (3.28 L/h) and relatively large distribution volume at steady state (94.8 L). Body weight (-26 to +36%) and coadministration of itraconazole (+64%) or rifampicin (-68%) were associated with a greater influence on esaxerenone exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The most influential covariates on esaxerenone exposure were coadministrations of itraconazole and rifampicin, followed by body weight. The clinical relevance of effects of renal impairment, mild to moderate hepatic impairment, and age is limited.

Trastuzumab Deruxtecan Dosing in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Gastric Cancer: Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Exposure-Response Analysis.

This study evaluated the benefit/risk of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) 6.4 mg/kg in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive gastric cancer using pharmacometrics. A population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model was developed using data from patients with gastric cancer, breast cancer, or other tumors in T-DXd clinical trials, primarily conducted in Asia. Post hoc model-estimated pharmacokinetic metrics were used in exposure-efficacy (objective response rates, ORRs) and exposure-safety analyses. The PopPK analysis included 808 patients (217 with gastric cancer, 512 with breast cancer, and 79 with other cancers). In gastric cancer, the T-DXd 6.4 mg/kg steady-state exposure metrics were lower compared with 6.4 mg/kg in breast cancer, but were similar to 5.4 mg/kg in breast cancer. Tumor type was selected as a significant covariate on T-DXd clearance. In exposure-efficacy analysis among 160 patients with gastric cancer, the T-DXd steady-state minimum concentration was associated with a confirmed ORR in univariate logistic regression analysis (P = .023). The model-predicted confirmed ORRs in gastric cancer were 36.0% (90%CI 29.3% to 43.7%) with 5.4 mg/kg and 40.0% (90%CI 33.1% to 47.6%) with 6.4 mg/kg. Among 808 patients in the exposure-safety analyses, the model-predicted estimates for the rates of any-grade interstitial lung disease (ILD) over a period of 180 days were 10.2% (90%CI 8.7% to 12.8%) with 6.4 mg/kg in gastric cancer and 9.7% (90%CI 8.2% to 11.8%) with 5.4 mg/kg in breast cancer. In gastric cancer, the efficacy of T-DXd was higher at 6.4 mg/kg than at 5.4 mg/kg. Exposure and ILD rates were comparable between 6.4 mg/kg in gastric cancer and 5.4 mg/kg in breast cancer. This study identified T-DXd 6.4 mg/kg as the recommended dose in HER2-positive gastric cancer.

Exposure-Response Relationships in Patients With HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer and Other Solid Tumors Treated With Trastuzumab Deruxtecan.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is a HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugate composed of a novel enzyme-cleavable linker and membrane-permeable topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. T-DXd has been approved for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and for HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancer. The approval in breast cancer was based on results from the DESTINY-Breast01 (U201; NCT03248492) and J101 (NCT02564900) trials. Here, we present dose justification for the approved 5.4 mg/kg every-3-weeks (Q3W) dose based on exposure-efficacy evaluated in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (N = 337) from these 2 trials. Exposure-safety was assessed in patients with all tumor types (N = 639, n = 512 with breast cancer) across 5 trials, including J101 and DESTINY-Breast01. T-DXd doses ranged from 0.8-8.0 mg/kg Q3W; most patients received 5.4 (n = 312) or 6.4 mg/kg (n = 291). For each end point, multivariate logistic or Cox regression analysis was performed using various exposure metrics of T-DXd and released drug. A statistically significant association was observed between intact T-DXd area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and confirmed objective response rate (ORR; P = 0.028). No significant exposure-response relationships were observed between intact T-DXd or released drug and duration of response or progression-free survival; however, follow-up was limited. All evaluated safety end points demonstrated a significant (P < 0.05) relationship with either intact T-DXd or released drug, with higher adverse event (AE) rates projected at higher exposures. Dose-response projections suggested an increase in ORR (67.5% vs. 62.9%) and toxicity (e.g., grade ≥ 3 all-cause treatment-emergent AEs: 61% vs. 54%) with T-DXd 6.4 vs. 5.4 mg/kg. Results demonstrate the benefit-risk profile at different doses and guide clinicians in the use of the 5.4-mg/kg Q3W dose in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Pharmacometric analyses to characterize the effect of CSL112 on apolipoprotein A-I and cholesterol efflux capacity in acute myocardial infarction patients.

AIMS: To characterize relationships between apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) exposure and cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) and covariate effects following CSL112 (apoA-I [human]) administration in an integrated population including acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. METHODS: A pharmacometric analysis utilized data from seven clinical trials, including patients with AMI, subjects with renal impairment and healthy subjects. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was performed to relate CSL112 doses to changes in apoA-I plasma concentrations. Covariate analysis was conducted to identify sources of variability in apoA-I exposure. Exposure-response modeling was conducted to describe the relationship between apoA-I exposure and total or ATP binding cassette transporter A1-(ABCA1)-dependent CEC and to identify clinical predictors of CEC. RESULTS: A two-compartment model described apoA-I PK. ApoA-I clearance was slightly lower in subjects with AMI, whereas baseline apoA-I was marginally higher in female and Japanese subjects. Covariate effects on apoA-I exposure were in the order of 10% and thus not clinically relevant. The relationships between apoA-I exposure and CECs were described by nonlinear models. Simulations showed CEC elevation resulting from apoA-I exposure increment was comparable in AMI and non-AMI subjects; no covariate had clinically meaningful effects on CEC. Simulations also demonstrated that CEC in patients with AMI post 6 g CSL112 dosing was substantially elevated compared to placebo and lower dose levels. CONCLUSIONS: The model-based exposure-response analysis demonstrated, irrespective of body weight, sex and race, that fixed 6 g CSL112 dosing causes a desired CEC elevation, which may benefit AMI patients by potentially reducing early recurrent cardiovascular event risk.

Reporting guidelines for population pharmacokinetic analyses.

The purpose of this work was to develop a consolidated set of guiding principles for the reporting of population pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses based on input from a survey of practitioners as well as discussions between industry, consulting, and regulatory scientists. The survey found that identification of population covariate effects on drug exposure and support for dose selection (in which population PK frequently serves as preparatory analysis for exposure-response modeling) are the main areas of influence for population PK analysis. The proposed guidelines consider 2 main purposes of population PK reports: (1) to present key analysis findings and their impact on drug development decisions, and (2) as documentation of the analysis methods for the dual purpose of enabling review of the analysis and facilitating future use of the models. This work also identified 2 main audiences for the reports: (1) a technically competent group responsible for in-depth review of the data, methodology, and results; and (2) a scientifically literate but not technically adept group, whose main interest is in the implications of the analysis for the broader drug development program. We recommend a generalized question-based approach with 6 questions that need to be addressed throughout the report. We recommend 8 sections (Synopsis, Introduction, Data, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusions, Appendix) with suggestions for the target audience and level of detail for each section. A section providing general expectations regarding population PK reporting from a regulatory perspective is also included. We consider this an important step toward industrialization of the field of pharmacometrics such that a nontechnical audience also understands the role of pharmacometric analyses in decision making. Population PK reports were chosen as representative reports to derive these recommendations; however, the guiding principles presented here are applicable for all pharmacometric reports including pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and simulation reports.

Reporting guidelines for population pharmacokinetic analyses.

The purpose of this work was to develop a consolidated set of guiding principles for reporting of population pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses based on input from a survey of practitioners as well as discussions between industry, consulting and regulatory scientists. The survey found that identification of population covariate effects on drug exposure and support for dose selection (where population PK frequently serves as preparatory analysis to exposure-response modeling) are the main areas of influence for population PK analysis. The proposed guidelines consider two main purposes of population PK reports (1) to present key analysis findings and their impact on drug development decisions, and (2) as documentation of the analysis methods for the dual purpose of enabling review of the analysis and facilitating future use of the models. This work also identified two main audiences for the reports: (1) a technically competent group responsible for in-depth review of the data, methodology, and results, and (2) a scientifically literate, but not technically adept group, whose main interest is in the implications of the analysis for the broader drug development program. We recommend a generalized question-based approach with six questions that need to be addressed throughout the report. We recommend eight sections (Synopsis, Introduction, Data, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusions, Appendix) with suggestions for the target audience and level of detail for each section. A section providing general expectations regarding population PK reporting from a regulatory perspective is also included. We consider this an important step towards industrialization of the field of pharmacometrics such that non-technical audience also understands the role of pharmacometrics analyses in decision making. Population PK reports were chosen as representative reports to derive these recommendations; however, the guiding principles presented here are applicable for all pharmacometric reports including PKPD and simulation reports.

Modeling and simulation of bone mineral density response from a phase 2 study of ONO-5334, a new cathepsin K inhibitor, to support dose selection in osteoporosis.

ONO-5334, a selective inhibitor of cathepsin K, is a potential new treatment for osteoporosis. The objectives of this modeling study were to (1) develop exposure-response (E-R) models to relate ONO-5334 exposure to bone mineral density (BMD), (2) predict BMD responses to various doses of ONO-5334 for both immediate release tablet (IRT) and sustained release tablet (SRT) formulations where only BMD response after administration of IRT had been studied to date, (3) inform selection of appropriate formulation/dose using simulation for future clinical trials. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed to simultaneously analyze data for both IRT and SRT. The exposure metrics at steady state were estimated by post hoc Bayesian prediction using the final population PK model. E-R models were developed using dose-ranging data with only IRT from postmenopausal females with osteoporosis. Based on the developed model, lumbar spine and total hip BMD after administration of ONO-5334 SRT as well as IRT were simulated. The simulation results showed that ONO-5334 SRT should provide comparable BMD responses at a lower dose relative to IRT (a finding consistent with the results from a previous population PK-PD modeling study with bone resorption markers).

Novel, biocompatible, and disease modifying VIP nanomedicine for rheumatoid arthritis.

Despite advances in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment, efficacious and safe disease-modifying therapy still represents an unmet medical need. Here, we describe an innovative strategy to treat RA by targeting low doses of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) self-associated with sterically stabilized micelles (SSMs). This spontaneous interaction of VIP with SSM protects the peptide from degradation or inactivation in biological fluids and prolongs circulation half-life. Treatment with targeted low doses of nanosized SSM-VIP but not free VIP in buffer significantly reduced the incidence and severity of arthritis in an experimental model, completely abrogating joint swelling and destruction of cartilage and bone. In addition, SSM associated VIP, unlike free VIP, had no side-effects on the systemic functions due to selective targeting to inflamed joints. Finally, low doses of VIP in SSM successfully downregulated both inflammatory and autoimmune components of RA. Collectively, our data clearly indicate that VIP-SSM should be developed to be used as a novel nanomedicine for the treatment of RA.

Characterisation of exposure versus response of edoxaban in patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery.

Edoxaban is an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor approved for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Japan. The objectives of this analysis were to characterise the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of edoxaban and the relationships between edoxaban exposure and clinical outcomes in a phase IIb study of surgical patients following total hip replacement (THR). A total of 1,795 subjects from a phase IIb study, 10 phase I studies, and three phase IIa studies were included in the PK analysis. The exposure-response analysis included data from surgical patients assigned to edoxaban in the phase IIb study. Edoxaban disposition in healthy and post-surgical patients was well-described with a linear, two-compartment model. Creatinine clearance was significantly correlated with edoxaban clearance and the rate of oral absorption was affected by surgery. The probability of a post-operative VTE was significantly correlated with steady-state metrics of edoxaban exposure estimated for each subject by Bayesian post-hoc methods with age and gender being the significant and expected covariates. The incidence of bleeding was low in these studies and hence no exposure-response relationship could be identified. These analyses suggest that edoxaban has a predictable anticoagulant effect in this patient population leading to dose-proportional reduction in incidence of VTE with low incidence of bleeding.

Modelling and simulation of edoxaban exposure and response relationships in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Edoxaban is a novel, orally available, highly specific direct inhibitor of factor Xa and is currently being developed for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism and prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The objectives of the present analyses were to characterise edoxaban population pharmacokinetics (PPK) and identify potential intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting variability in edoxaban exposure, determine if there are relationships between edoxaban pharmacokinetics or biomarkers and the risk of bleeding in patients with NVAF using an exposure-response model, and to use the PPK and exposure-response model to support dose selection for a phase III trial of edoxaban in patients with NVAF. PPK analysis of data from 1,281 edoxaban-dosed subjects with intrinsic factors such as renal impairment or NVAF and extrinsic factors such as concomitant medications revealed significant effects of renal impairment and concomitant strong P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of edoxaban. Exposure-response analysis found that in patients with NVAF, the incidence of bleeding events increased significantly with increasing edoxaban exposure, with steady-state minimum concentration (Cmin,ss) showing the strongest association. Clinical trial simulations of bleeding incidence were used to select 30 mg and 60 mg once-daily edoxaban with 50% dose reductions for patients with moderate renal impairment or receiving concomitant strong P-gp inhibitors as the treatment regimens in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (NCT00781391) trial.

Population pharmacokinetics of vernakalant hydrochloride injection (RSD1235) in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter.

Vernakalant hydrochloride is a novel, predominantly atrial-selective antiarrhythmic drug that effectively and rapidly terminates atrial fibrillation (AF). Plasma vernakalant concentration data from 5 phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of vernakalant in patients with AF or atrial flutter and a phase 1 study in healthy volunteers were used to construct a population pharmacokinetic model. Plasma vernakalant concentration-time data were best fit by a 2-compartment mammillary model, with rapid first-order elimination from the central compartment. Median systemic clearance was 0.35 L/h/kg (or 28 L/h for an 80-kg patient), with intersubject variability estimated to be 40%. Clearance was significantly influenced by CYP2D6 genotype, age, serum creatinine concentration, and subject status (patient vs volunteer). The intercompartmental clearance was also influenced by subject status, whereas the volumes of the central compartment and peripheral compartment were unaffected by any covariates. Based on the final pharmacokinetic model, the area under the plasma vernakalant concentration-time curve from 0 to 90 minutes was estimated to be 15% higher in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers than extensive metabolizers, with age and serum creatinine having much smaller influences on exposure. These data suggest that dose adjustments based on patient characteristics, including use of concomitant drugs, are unnecessary for intravenous vernakalant.

Population pharmacokinetic model for a novel oral hypoglycemic formed in vivo: comparing the use of active metabolite data alone versus using data of upstream and downstream metabolites.

The purpose of this analysis was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for CS-917, an oral hypoglycemic prodrug, and its 3 metabolites. The population pharmacokinetic model was used to predict exposure of the active moiety R-125338 and thus to identify potential CS-917 dosage reduction criteria. The dataset included 6 phase I and IIa studies in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The pharmacokinetic profile of CS-917 and its metabolites was described by a series of linked 1- and 2-compartmental models. Simulations showed that moderate renal impairment has a clinically significant impact on exposure to R-125338. A separate population pharmacokinetic analysis of R-125338 alone revealed similar results. In conclusion, a population pharmacokinetic model fit to the active moiety alone yielded similar predictions and substantially reduced the analysis time compared to the more complex model developed for CS-917 and its metabolites. Increased exposure to R-125338 in the presence of moderate renal impairment may be an important consideration for dose selection.

Randomised, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational phase 2 study comparing edoxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, with warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation.

The primary objective of this study was to compare the safety of four fixed-dose regimens of edoxaban with warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). In this 12-week, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational study, 1,146 patients with AF and risk of stroke were randomised to edoxaban 30 mg qd, 30 mg bid, 60 mg qd, or 60 mg bid or warfarin dose-adjusted to a target international normalised ratio of 2.0-3.0. The study was double-blind to edoxaban dose, but open-label to warfarin. Primary outcomes were occurrence of major and/or clinically relevant non-major bleeding and elevated hepatic enzymes and/or bilirubin. Mean age was 65 +/- 8.7 years and 64.4% were warfarin-naïve. Whereas major plus clinically relevant non-major bleeding occurred in 3.2% of patients randomised to warfarin, the incidence of bleeding was significantly higher with the edoxaban 60 mg bid (10.6%; p=0.002) and 30 mg bid regimens (7.8%; p=0.029), but not with the edoxaban 60 mg qd (3.8%) or 30 mg qd regimens (3.0%). For the same total daily dose of 60 mg, both bleeding frequency and trough edoxaban concentrations were higher in the 30-mg bid group than in the 60-mg qd group. There were no significant differences in hepatic enzyme elevations or bilirubin values among the groups. The safety profiles of edoxaban 30 and 60 mg qd in patients with AF were similar to warfarin. In contrast, the edoxaban bid regimens were associated with more bleeding than warfarin. These results suggest that in this three-month study, edoxaban 30 or 60 mg qd are safe and well-tolerated.

Adherence and persistence with oral adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with early-stage breast cancer in CALGB 49907: adherence companion study 60104.

PURPOSE: Patient adherence is critical in evaluating the effectiveness of an oral therapy. We sought to measure adherence among women randomly assigned to capecitabine in a preplanned substudy of a multicenter clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cancer and Leukemia Group B study CALGB 49907 was a randomly assigned trial comparing standard chemotherapy versus oral chemotherapy with capecitabine in patients age 65 years or older with early-stage breast cancer. We used microelectronic monitoring system (MEMS) caps on participants' capecitabine bottles to record pill bottle openings. Capecitabine was given in two divided daily doses for 14 consecutive days of a 21-day cycle for six cycles. Adherence was calculated as the number of doses taken divided by doses expected, taking into account toxicity-related dosing changes. A participant was defined as adherent if 80% or more of expected doses were recorded by MEMS. RESULTS: Overall, 161 patients were enrolled. Median age was 71 years (range, 65 to 89 years); 124 patients (83%) persisted with capecitabine to completion of planned protocol therapy. Adherence was 78% across all cycles, and adherence did not vary by cycle (P = .32). Twenty-five percent of participants took fewer than 80% of expected doses and were nonadherent. In a logistic regression model, participants with node-negative disease (P = .01) and mastectomy (P = .01) were more likely to be nonadherent. Adherence was not related to age, tumor stage, or hormone receptor status. Adherence was not significantly associated with relapse-free survival or grade 3 or 4 toxicity. CONCLUSION: Most older women with early-stage breast cancer were adherent to short-term oral chemotherapy in a randomized clinical trial. Age was not associated with adherence.

Pain relief model for a COX-2 inhibitor in patients with postoperative dental pain.

AIM: To develop a pain relief model for a cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor, CS-706, that permits prediction of doses for acute pain relief in Japanese and Western populations. METHODS: A categorical response model was developed to describe the probability of pain relief (PR) over time for a Phase 2a study. Models were also developed to describe patient's use of rescue medication and onset of pain relief. RESULTS: The placebo response was described by a first-order increase in PR that achieved a stable response after 4 h. The effect of CS-706 on PR was described using an E(max) model; the plasma concentration of CS-706 producing 50% of the maximum response was estimated to be 87 ng ml(-1), the median peak plasma concentration achieved after a 50-mg oral dose. The probability of rescue medication (REMD) decreased over time and was a function of the last observed PR score. This probability was < 16% for patients with a PR score > or =2. The probability of experiencing meaningful PR was 98% in patients who did not require REMD and 47% in those who required REMD. For patients who did not require REMD, the median onset time of meaningful pain relief (TMPR) decreased with increasing doses. In patients who required REMD, there was a saturable decline in TMPR, with the greatest improvement occurring from placebo to 50-mg doses. CONCLUSIONS: The set of models developed permitted compilation of multiple dose-response curves for dose selection of CS-706 in Westerners and facilitated scaling of doses to a Japanese population.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and adherence to oral topotecan in myelodysplastic syndromes: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate medication adherence, pharmacokinetics and exposure versus response relationships in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). METHODS: Ninety adult patients with MDS received oral topotecan (1.2 mg/m2) either once a day for 10 days or twice a day for 5 days every 21 days for up to six cycles. Dosing histories were collected using electronic monitoring devices fitted to medication vials. Topotecan plasma concentrations were measured, and exposure was determined by a sparse sampling approach and Bayesian estimation methods. Relationships between exposure and clinical response and toxicity were evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall adherence was excellent with 90% of patients taking the prescribed number of doses in cycle 1. Adherence did not differ between the two regimens. Topotecan pharmacokinetics were described using a one compartment open model with first order absorption and elimination. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates did not differ between the once a day and twice a day dosing groups. While topotecan exposure was greater in the twice a day arm compared to the once a day arm due to drug accumulation, exposure did not correlate with clinical response. However, the probability of needing a platelet transfusion in the twice a day arm was significantly increased (by 35%) as a result of greater steady-state plasma topotecan concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence is high in patients with MDS receiving oral topotecan, whether the drug is prescribed once or twice daily. The optimal schedule cannot be determined from this study, as there was no evident relationship between any pharmacokinetic parameter and clinical response.

Disposition of morphine in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid varies during neonatal development in pigs.

The pharmacological effects of morphine are mediated via the central nervous system (CNS) but its clearance from the CNS in neonates has not been investigated. We have proposed that neonatal development of the blood-brain barrier affected CNS clearance mechanisms and CNS exposure to morphine. Male piglets (n = 5) aged one, three and six weeks were given morphine sulfate (0.5 mg kg(-1), i.v.). Serial blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were withdrawn over 360 min after morphine administration. Morphine concentration was measured by radioimmunoassay. A three-compartment model was fitted to individual data. Estimated parameters were reported as median and range. The peak morphine concentrations in plasma were not significantly different in the one-, three- or six-week-old piglets. Plasma clearance at one week (4.5, 3.8-8.6 mL min(-1) kg(-1)) was significantly lower than at three weeks (30.0, 19.1- 39.0 mL min(-1) kg(-1)) and six weeks (37.0, 29.7-82.8 mL min(-1) kg(-1)). The peak morphine concentration in CSF at one week (59.84, 31-67 ng mL(-1)) was higher than at three weeks (18.8, 17.7-25 ng mL(-1)) and six weeks (24.51, 16.5-84 ng mL(-1)), while CSF clearance was lower at one week (1.0, 0.18-9 mL min(-1) kg(-1)) compared with three weeks (6.2, 2.3-9.3 mL min(-1) kg(-1)) and six weeks (3.95, 1.3-85.7 mL min(-1) kg(-1)). Apparent plasma:CSF transfer ratio at one week was greater than at three and six weeks. The reduced plasma and CSF morphine clearance in early infancy resulted in elevated systemic and central morphine exposure in neonatal pigs.

Population pharmacokinetics of daptomycin.

Data from subjects in nine phase 1 (n = 153) and six phase 2/3 (n = 129) clinical trials were combined to identify factors contributing to interindividual variability in daptomycin pharmacokinetics (PK). Over 30 covariates were considered. A two-compartment model with first-order elimination provided the best fit for data on daptomycin concentrations in plasma over time. In the final population PK model, daptomycin plasma clearance (CL) was a function of renal function, body temperature, and sex. Of these factors, renal function contributed most significantly to interindividual variability. CL varied linearly with the estimated creatinine clearance. CL among dialysis subjects was approximately one-third that of healthy subjects (0.27 versus 0.81 liter/h). CL in females was 80% that in males; however, in clinical trials, the outcome was not affected by sex and therefore this effect is not considered clinically meaningful. The relationship with body temperature should be interpreted cautiously since the analysis included only a limited number of subjects who were hyperthermic. The volume of distribution of the peripheral compartment (V2) and intercompartmental clearance (Q) were linearly related to body weight. V2 increased approximately twofold in the presence of an acute infection. No factors were identified that significantly impacted V1. This analysis supports the dosing of daptomycin on a milligram-per-kilogram-of-body-weight basis and suggests that modified dosing regimens are indicated for patients with severe renal disease and for those undergoing dialysis.

Population pharmacokinetic model for irinotecan and two of its metabolites, SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to develop and validate a population pharmacokinetic model for irinotecan and 2 of its metabolites, SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G). METHODS: Plasma concentrations were obtained during and up to 48 hours after a 90-minute continuous intravenous infusion of irinotecan (100-340 mg/m(2)) in 78 patients. Data splitting was used to create model-building and model-validation data sets. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were obtained by compartmental methods to describe the disposition of metabolites that are dependent on the disposition of the parent compound. Relationships between patient attributes and estimates of clearance (CL) and volume of the central compartment for irinotecan, as well as CL and volume of the central compartment adjusted for the fraction metabolized for SN-38 and SN-38G, were explored by use of generalized additive models and graphic analysis. Selected covariates were introduced into the final population model by stepwise additions or deletions with the likelihood ratio test. RESULTS: SN-38 and SN-38G were shown to be formation rate-limited and were characterized by first-order rate constants of formation and elimination. Two subpopulations of SN-38 disposition were identified, presumably because of differences in the fraction of metabolite formed from the parent compound. Estimated irinotecan CL (25.2 L/h) was similar to that determined in other studies. Age and performance status were found to be important predictors of irinotecan CL, whereas variability in systemic exposure to the active metabolite, SN-38, was predicted by sex and hepatic function. CONCLUSION: The validated population pharmacokinetic model describing the disposition of irinotecan and 2 of its metabolites should facilitate the design of future studies to elucidate the relative contributions of the parent compound and SN-38 to the pharmacologic and toxic effects of irinotecan therapy.